Politics, Business and Bureaucracy free essay sample

The advisor was called a ‘Rajarishi’. Although the king was the ruler, he ruled as per the Brahmans’ advices. One such advisor was Chanakya. Businessmen represent the class of people who provide employment to fellow citizens. Their motive is to make a good living for themselves and the society at large. They help facilitate trade between countries and ensure equitable justice to all employees at work. In ancient India, the Vaishya community represented this class of people. They were traders, inherently, generation after generation. Books like Arthashaastra describe how trade needs to be carried out, the economics involved and the business and the ethical aspects of it. Bureaucrats are those who facilitate the politicians in Governmental work. They are basically Government servants, and as the name suggests, facilitate the politicians in serving the people. The duty of the bureaucrats is to be receptive to both the citizens and the master and help the latter in the process. We will write a custom essay sample on Politics, Business and Bureaucracy or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page More than being receptive to the master, he is supposed to follow the orders and carry out the activities in the redressal system. In ancient India, the Brahmin advisors were shrewd and advised the kings on how the bureaucrats could best serve the people. This pattern helped conduct the administration smoothly to ensure equitable distribution of resources, welfare and justice to all sections of the society. The fourth class of people in ancient India were the Shudras who did menial jobs and helped the above three classes of people carry out their activities. The ancient caste system in India – the Brahmans, the Kshatriyas, the Vaishyas and the Shudras – was divided on the basis of character and quality and not on the basis of birth. The traditional Vedic system of determining the caste to which a child belonged to was determined at a young age. Four objects – a book, a sword, a pot of gold coins and a bowl of grains – were placed in front of the child. The choice of objects, representation of the classes, determined the child’s class. A book, representing knowledge, for the Brahmins, a sword representing valour for the Kshatriyas, a pot of gold coins depicting business sense for the Vaishyas and grains representing the need to gratify the senses for the Shudras. For many thousand years, it so used to happen that the child of a Brahmin had the characteristics of a Brahmin, the child of a Kshatriya possessed those of Kshatriya etc†¦ But after a period of time, the above attempt was stopped from practice and the choice of caste became a birth right without taking one’s innate ability into account. There started a period of tumultuous breakdown of the system; wherein, anyone could educate anyone, anyone could rule anyone and anyone could serve anyone. The supposed Brahmins started an autocratic rule and began looking at the Shudras with contempt and started to mistreat them. It was greed and want for money for self-interest that pervaded the minds of one and all. And, the level of greed was at such a height that people could involve themselves in activities even if it was at the expense of someone else. The earlier mentioned triangle – equilateral – aimed at ensuring equitable distribution of resources, welfare activities and justice to all – started to become fatal for the system. The 18th century Industrialization in the British colony was an upsurge against the above. It seemed to have all answers to the existing impoverishment, unemployment, inequitable distribution of wealth and the low standard of living. Formulation of labour laws, the Human Rights Acts etc†¦ followed. People were made to believe that money is means to ‘the-be-all and the-end-all’ in life. It was appreciative that steep unemployment and impoverishment rates were addressed by the 18th century Capitalists. With this, the West proved its upper hand over the Czars’ Communism. The quantitative distribution of wealth and resources in a Capitalistic society exceeded the one of the Communistic. Although the former never emphasized on the ‘equitable’ aspect, workers remained indifferent and started to glorify the Capitalistic method of business administration for improving their standard of living. Efficiency and productivity significantly improved, sometimes by the exploitation of labour. Frequent strikes, hartals etc†¦ ensured proper labour laws were promulgated and at times amended. This is one area where the Capitalists won over the Communists in terms of satisfying people. Due to the intense competition that followed among the Capitalists, with the French concept of Laissez faire being glorified, the need for businessmen to collaborate with the political aspect of the system arose. This was facilitated by the bureaucratic route to it. With monetary benefits on the minds of everyone, breakdown of the qualitative caste system once prevalent and the need to gratify one’s senses alone making sense to all, there was chaos – lack of principles and digression of what one carried out at work/service from what one was supposed to do. On the minds of every citizen was money, which could be achieved through employment in business. The motive of the politician was to serve people and the only way his service could be honoured was if he assured employment, which was a means to prosperity. Partnering with businessmen was one such way forward. While the politicians had self-interest beyond service, it turned into ‘collusion’ with the help of the bureaucrats. Rampant corruption is what it has led the world to. In the United States, it has been observed that around 99% of the country’s wealth is shared by just 1% of the population